Wednesday, October 29, 2014

Texting: What Has It Become? // ED 7718: Open Mic #3 Response

Do we use texting, email, smartphones to avoid ‘awkward’ silence or being alone with ourselves?


I think people definitely use texting, email and smartphones to avoid “awkward silence.” It’s not unusual to see people sitting together in a restaurant, all with cell phones in their hands or on the table, either texting or waiting for an “all important” message to arrive. People live in a constant state of “waiting for connection.”  People want to be “interrupted” (Turkle p. 171).  As Turkle points out, screen communication can be “a place to hide”(p. 187). By focusing on the phone, people avoid the face to face communication that can be  much more challenging. Hiding behind a smartphone also shelters people from being truly alone. Constantly being connected denies people the time to be alone with their thoughts. Again, Turkle warns that such connectedness can be particularly dangerous for adolescents who “need time to discover themselves, time to think” (p. 172). Teenagers are still developing and discovering their own identity, but without time to be truly alone, “When is downtime? When is stillness?” (Turkle, p. 172). Not only do kids lack alone time, the image or avatar they portray of themselves online frequently isn’t who they really are.
As an adult, I see how constant “phone checking” not only prevents productive face to face communication, but also insults the person I’m with. Shouldn’t the person I’m with be more important than whoever is on the other end of the phone? I know I’m guilty of using a smartphone to avoid those uncomfortable situations at times, but I try to be aware and limit my use. My family loves their cell phones, but everyone knows that they’re not allowed at the dinner table. That text can wait.


Does texting contribute to social awkwardness?


To some degree, texting can contribute to social awkwardness, mainly by allowing people to avoid sensitive situations. The article, “Unplug the Kids” states, "We risk educating an entire generation of students who don't know how to work together or communicate effectively face-to-face." We don’t want to raise a generation of kids who live in a “virtual world.” This argument is supported by the Time article, “We Never Talk Anymore: The Problem With Text Messaging.” When kids rely too much on texting, interpersonal social skills which are still in the developmental process, suffer. Kids, especially in middle school, have “virtual” boyfriends or girlfriends. It’s possible for two kids to “go out” without ever speaking to each other.
Kids can also lose sight of what’s appropriate in texting. There are problems with cyberbullying and sexting, which are a constant concern. Recently, in upstate New York, several middle schoolers were disciplined over suggestive selfies. Girls took pictures of themselves in various stages of undress and sold them to boys for $10 a piece. Frequently, actions conducted online would not occur in person. While this example is beyond “social awkwardness,” the impersonal nature of texting tempts kids to behave inappropriately. The danger exists for kids to forget what is socially acceptable and what is not.


Are parents pushing the use of texting so they can ease their minds about their children’s whereabouts and safety? Does that allow children to be more or less independent?


As a parent, texting is extremely convenient and it helps me to keep in touch with my kids. As Nancy Lublin states in the video, “Texting That Saves Lives,” texting is the “best way to communicate with a teenager.” I will go a step further and say that it’s extremely helpful to keep in touch with everyone. For me, I communicate frequently with my adult children and with my many brothers and sisters. I love being able to text my kids, even if it’s just a quick “Have a great day” as a morning greeting.
My children are all grown up and they all live away from home; my youngest son is moving to Boston this week. With six kids and an age range of ten years, I’ve seen the role of texting change from nonexistent to dominant. When my older children were in high school, they didn’t have cell phones. Yet, ironically, I feel that I had a better handle on who they were hanging around with and what they were doing. Their friends had to call the house phone (almost an archaic term now), to get in touch with them. That gave me a chance to chat with my children’s friends. I also knew that if twenty calls came in, something was up. With my younger children, cell phones became the norm. They texted to make all their plans, so I was effectively out of the loop. While I could text them (and did) to find out where they were or why they were late, I think that sometimes I was more aware of what they were really doing when they didn’t have cell phones.  
Parents and children can definitely overdo the amount of texting, especially in the college years. I remember going to orientation for my son and the Deans telling the parents to let the kids handle their own issues. As Turkle says, we need to allow children to separate from their parents and constant “tethering” does not allow that. My children land in various positions on the continuum of connection. I get frequent, almost daily texts from some, and from another, I may send a text after ten days of silence asking, “Are you alive?” The answer comes back, “Yes!” (Which is good to know!)
Overall, texting is a “double edged sword.” I certainly wouldn’t want to give it up. The benefits are enormous. I love being able to get in touch with people instantly. I love that it’s noninvasive. I don’t hesitate to text someone with a question or comment, knowing that they can answer me when they get a chance. I do, however, worry about too much reliance on texting at the expense of face to face, or spoken conversations. I also don’t want to see kids lose touch with the natural word or forget how to play. I want to see people living in “real time in the real world,” not “virtual time in a virtual world.” Like everything, balance is required. As I said with reading online, “Embrace the new, but don’t throw away the old.”

Monday, October 20, 2014

The ITDML Journey on Storify / Reflection: MOOC Module 3: Week 2


I’ve been wanting to try Storify, so the activity this week was great. I found it easy to use. Following the journey theme, I began with a confusing intersection. When I first started in the summer, I had no idea what I was doing. I felt that I was hopelessly in over my head. All the while, I was thinking, “This is summer. I should be at the beach!” Hence, my second picture. However, the hard work is beginning to pay off. I’m learning a lot and I’ve added a lot of new technology-based elements to my teaching. I think the kids have really been engaged. In a way, I’m experimenting with them which seems to be working. I’m looking forward to using Storify with my students soon - we’ll see how it goes!

Thursday, October 16, 2014

Online Reading Comprehension: Module 3: ED 7720

In the article, "Online Reading Comprehension," Kevin Hodgson describes the “reading” of a twelve year as he jumps from screen to screen and bounces from one hyperlink to the next. As an avid reader and English teacher, I can relate to the notion that such reading “is enough to drive you to the brink of despair. I have asked myself the question, “Can you read or think deeply online?”
Clearly, the format of reading has changed drastically in a very short time. I just finished discussing some of the differences with my students, and they were quick to reply that there are a lot of distractions online. However, they all agreed that easy and quick access to information was a definite plus. Many students prefer online reading because, “they like to read pieces that are short” and they like to “switch between articles.” Surprisingly though, there are students who prefer offline reading. One student said, “I just like the feel of a book in my hand.” I agree with everything that the kids said. I, too, see the positives and negatives.
I definitely think that I read differently online. I skim and scan much more. I am able to effectively filter out the sidebar distractions. If there are links that I want to investigate, I usually read the whole article first and then go back, because I still like to do things in a linear fashion. When I have to read something thoroughly, I don’t usually print it out, but I do take notes (handwritten). Writing down information helps to keep me focused and definitely improves my comprehension. Although I love the convenience of my Kindle, I still enjoy a “real” book. I would never give up online reading, but I do think that I read and think more deeply when I am reading offline.
The format in which information is presented online also affects one’s perception of its validity. When reading the articles for the Module 3 MOOC, all of the New Literacies articles are scholarly papers. They are presented as papers online; they are text only without  additional images, videos or distracting advertisements. The content, presentation and authorship enhance the perception of the articles’ validity and rigor. The information is well researched and academically substantial. On the other hand, the article by Hodgson is shorter and includes tables, pictures and diagrams. The article may not appear as scholarly, but it is much more approachable. Reading it doesn’t seem as daunting. The information appears to be well-researched, and is definitely accessible and helpful.
There is no doubt that more and more reading will be done online. As a result, we have an obligation to make sure that our students develop strategies to read effectively online. We need to remind them to “cut out the clutter,” as Hodgson says. We also need to teach  them to scan, to skim and to synthesize sources. Modeling can help, as can group work where students discuss what they are reading and their strategies with each other. We also need to stress that importance of recognizing the validity of sources. We can’t assume that all of our students are “digital natives.” Students need multiple opportunities to practice reading a variety of online sources.
On a final note, as much as I value online reading, one of my concerns continues to be the effect it has on very young children. We’ve heard how important it is to limit “screen time” in young children, but what about reading on an iPad or a Kindle? Is that reading time or screen time? The New York Times had an interesting article last weekend,  Is E-Reading to Your Toddler Story Time, or Simply Screen Time?  The bottom line is that no one really knows. As with so much of technology, there are positives and negatives, and the long term effect isn’t known. Whether it’s in the classroom or at home, my philosophy will continue to be to embrace the new without throwing away the old. Good Night Moon or Where the Wild Things Are just wouldn’t be the same online.

Citations:

Hodgson, Kevin. Strategies for Online Reading Comprehension

Quenqua, Douglas. “Is E-Reading to Your  Toddler Story Time, or Simply Screen Time?” NY Times. 10/11/14.

Wednesday, October 15, 2014

The Power of Images: Open Mic Week #2 / ED 7718

First of all, let me begin by saying that I really enjoyed the readings and videos for this week. A great mix and lots to think about! As stated in the article, “Image is Everything: Why People Are Hooked on Image-Based Social Media,” “text-only” information is “old news,” largely due to SmartPhone photography. Tumblr, Pinterest and Instagram are growing rapidly; images can be so informative. Images have the ability not only to reinforce the message of a story, but also to make a story memorable. Although images are everywhere in today’s world, I don’t think the power of an image is a new phenomena. I think back to some of the most memorable events in recent American history, and what I remember are the images. When I think of 9/11, what comes to mind is the iconic image of the towers crumbling.

World Trade Center.png

When I think of the assassination of JFK, what comes to mind is the picture of John Kennedy, Jr. saluting his father’s casket.
JFK.jpg


Pictures have the power to capture a moment and make it enduring.


Images in the media have a huge effect on everyone and students in particular, especially in advertising. Steve Richards points out in his blog, “The Power of Pictures in Social Media Marketing,” that images can “transform consumers’ views.” This is definitely true for kids. Not only do kids want items that look appealing, they learn to identify with the person marketing the item or the image of the individuals in the advertisement. I am thinking of the power of images of professional athletes which entice students to buy sneakers, apparel and sports gear. Consider advertisements for beer which show groups of young people having a great time. Kids are very impressionable and are deeply affected, perhaps subconsciously, by such images in ads.
Images in the media of the “perfect looking person” are pervasive. Cameron Russell’s TED Talk stresses the notion that “image is powerful...but superficial.” Images in the media have contributed to the preponderance of young people who have negative body images. As Russell says, at age seventeen, 78% of girls don’t like their bodies. Young people (and not so young) are led to believe that they will be happier if they have thinner thighs, or just lose ten pounds. The obsession with body image has gone beyond health, and leads not only to poor self-image, but to serious eating disorders. People don’t realize that they images they see of models aren’t real. As Russell says, they are “constructions,” bearing little resemblance to reality. Yet, many people compare themselves to such images and needless to say, feel that they don’t measure up.
Videos like the Meghan Trainor’s, “All About Bass,” try to combat such perceptions by stressing, “Every inch of you is perfect from the bottom to the top.” I am also reminded of the Dove Real Beauty Campaign, which is one of the few advertising campaigns that features models of varying shapes and sizes, emphasizing that all people are beautiful. Companies like Dove realize the damage that is being caused by the unrealistic images of women in the media, but they are in the minority. The campaign is popular, and although companies like Dove are fighting an uphill battle, there is hope in the fact that Americans have been very receptive to the ads.
Social media advertising is becoming more and more prevalent. Without a doubt it is the wave of the future. As the Forbes Magazine article said, businesses must “keep up or be left behind.” What I find frightening about it is the way that it can be tailored to the individual. An individual’s social media profile is analyzed and targeted ads are sent to that person. For this reason, we need to make ourselves and kids aware of the potential for manipulation. It’s not that all products are bad, or that all marketing is dangerous, but consumers definitely need to be aware of what is being conveyed by the multitude of images they are confronted with every day.
Citations:

The Power of Words


Image is Everything: Why People Are Hooked on Image-Based Social Media


All About that Bass (lyrics compared to comments)

3 Ways Social Media Is Driving A Business Revolution
Looks aren’t everything.  Believe me, I’m a model.

Images:




Wednesday, October 8, 2014

A Collaborative Playlist / The ITDML Journey: ED 7720: Module 2

     It took me a while to decide what to add to the playlist. When thinking about the journey, my first thoughts were how much work it has been. I thought of "A Hard Day's Night," but scrapped that idea - too negative. Then I thought of "Let It Go" from Frozen since I feel like I need to be less of a perfectionist. I scrapped that idea also. I figured anyone with little kids has probably had more than enough of that song. Then I thought of "Running on Empty" by Jackson Browne which definitely fits, but I decided instead to focus on the positive.    
     I chose two songs, both of which are inspirational. First was "Born to Run" by Bruce Springsteen. I will admit that juggling so much has been stressful at times, but I like to run and that has been a release for me. Running has given me not only time to relax, but has produced some good ideas.  The second song I chose was "Here Comes the Sun" by the Beatles. I have always liked the song and it reminds me that no matter how stressful life is, the sun will come up and everything will be alright. After all, life is good!

   

Wednesday, October 1, 2014

I agree with much of what William Ferriter said in his article, “Digitally Speaking / Positive Digital Footprints.” There is a great deal of fear surrounding the Internet, and in particular, student use of the Internet. My school district is a prime example. We are encouraged to increase our use of technology in order to create students with “21st century skills,” yet many sites continue to be blocked. My most recent frustration is in the blocking of Google Plus. I had set up communities for my students so that they could blog and respond to each other, only to find that I was unable to use them with students. I was directed to Google Classroom, which I have begun using, but it has limitations. Students can reply to my prompts, but there is no efficient way for them to respond to each other. In addition, the site can only be accessed by students or staff with a school gmail address. As far as creating a website, or personal learning hub, the only other options are Google Sites or Final Site if I want student access. It seems to me as if it is time to address the fear and open up the options if we truly want students who are technologically savvy.
Certainly, as Ferriter says, educating students about Internet safety is important. I also agree with his “tiered approach” which suggests more safety training for kids who are at risk for dangerous Internet behavior. In addition to safety training, kids need to see the Internet as more than just social media and a convenient source of information. As Ferriter points out, the Internet can be “a vehicle for collective action around ideas they believe in…” The Internet allows people to connect to groups and individuals they care about.
As important as it is for people to develop a “digital footprint,” I believe it’s important for kids to limit their time online, especially when they are young. Technology skills are important, but they should not take the place of physical activity and personal social interaction. An interesting article appeared in the New York Times recently entitled, Steve Jobs Was A Low Tech Parent. According to the article, the biggest danger of the Internet is addictive behavior; children under ten are especially vulnerable. It’s interesting that, as the article points out, many technology chief executives place strict limits on their children’s use of technology.
I continue to believe that it’s important to educate myself and my students to use technology constructively. The possibilities and benefits are endless. We must not be fearful of technology, but we must temper the use of the devices that have become an essential part of our lives.

Citations: